SCOTUS on 14th Amendment:
Justices the arguments were inadequate to have met a rational textualism bar.
Any “born in” is an infant dependent upon parents’ status by first sentence asserts an infant locked into parents must “reside” in a state.
The #14thAmendment is flawed by uses “male” where otherwise originalism rested color & sex blind by implied “A FREE PERSON” an education standard for if one achieved an adequate high moral authority.
Citizenship part opens as to those do “reside” in a state.
Yet “jurisdiction” in our republic is not of “closed sets” especially as section 5 speaks to “provisions” as of we are constituted by a Peoples’ “Order” (noun).
14th cleverly leaves 3/5ths metric intact but requires it can only be still apportioned if a male has but been proven sub 60% moral.
“Birth Tourism” clearly a new development yet able to be checked as Amendment speaks to those who “reside” in a state – as innovations have shrunk travel time and generated near a whole new tourism culture.
“Subject” to must mean as parents do self-identify is not to be infringed while their travel must abide current jurisprudence of real-time jurisdiction ordered Liberty.
Indians have original option to self-select to also become subscribed into our Judeo-Christian ordered Liberty as “native” or to option remaining tribal so reserved to own territorial respected.
Our “rights from Creator” & “a free state” of each unum is by how united pluribus an individual a “child of God” then free to grow and hopefully not be measured a “tare” due to be round up and separated.
As constituted “subscribed” “done” in “Year of our Lord” there thus can be no right to crime – not right for incentivized illegality.
#BirthrightCitizenship post #PamBondi
#SupremeCourt 2026
#SCOTUS on 14th Amendment
Don’t miss #14thAmendment so cleverly left spirit of 3/5ths clause core for law and order as law but to apportioned less than a whole person if convicted of “a crime” to which citizenship and voting kept ideas for Liberty of some will be due incarceration – fewer freedoms/rights.
Anti-slavery amendments denied only that any was to be presumed based on their color or race as incapable of being adequately moral/civil.
“A crime” is dangerous political language due does not differentiate between misdemeanors and felonies.

Leave a comment