HOGAN2CENTS

PAY – SUBSCRIBE

RECENT POSTS

  • PHOENIX LAWLESS

    [ORIGINAL TO: 01/24/2014]

    To posit a conclusion for numerous different events of the past week, and uniformly, I reach to the story of a rising from the ashes of a phoenix.  There is a synchronicity now of these times of us attempting to be to a rising – a recovery – that behoove us to all consider a threat to humanity that some or one even may have designs upon opportunity for lawless Power.

    Even if so many rendered to ashes of fallen economies have been so as by accident and not willful intent and clever purposes (too selfish) of the leaders it is that a dangerous opportunity may be existent for a rebuilding yet arranged in a lawlessness.

    We all should be behoven to real dangers from opportunities for Powers in extra-Constitutional and post-Constitutional schematics.  One or even a few or more could with any mass rising so could be positioned for a rare power grab as if to an “I AM BACK” postured real powers of a socio-economic political new constitution for a few not though Constitutional by any existent Constitution.

    There are five flags to discuss and contrast with this expose of threats too possibly real.  There are more than a singular soul now possibly in a position to become constituted globally to new and great global yet not Constituted Powers.  Soon we can discuss the flags of the Third Reich the flag of Japan the flag of the European Union the flag of the Clinton Global Initiative and the all to somehow similar flag and standard of candidate Barack Hussein Obama.

    But first let us consider something that should be more of a common sense and as per term limits.  It seems that if term limits on a President are Constituted they are so as for dangers from a President having power too long.  It seems common sense that we all must consider that if we have term limits on a President for dangers from any having power for too long it has to be that any spouse of such President, regardless of sex for the most part, needest be considered as possibly being a greater threat and so most definitely also importantly limited as a half of the whole of them any could be in danger from with them of having power for too long.  It seems ridiculously common sense and respective of the natural state of humanity that if a term limit is prudent for a President it should be especially more importantly critical that a spouse firstly also be barred as by such limiting.  It seems simply that a spouse as a half of a whole about a Presidency is likely the more bitter and vengeful half that any People best be at protections from.  As per a hazard from not respecting that a spouse should be more feared than any named elected other half of the whole of their Presidency we have the risk of the above of possible situations from scheming to later risings like of an “I AM BACK” to a truly constituted new power actually considerate as not Constitutional at all.

    We can make an example for these purposes by a discussion of President Obama as if a lame duck.  It seems the Clintons towards a constituted “I AM BACK” or “WE ARE BACK” have yet failed while having though tried to render President Obama as not just a lame duck but effectively as one whom no one should any longer be still seeing as the leader of the Democrats.  We needn’t go to depth here on how and when the Clintons seemed to have already failed in partisan coup attempts at essentially a political neutering of President Obama — this is a matter still for whether President Obama actually has any juice left even in his own party and as we have a right to see yet if he can handle even the politics of the rivaling Clintons.

    So far though the Clintons are in a partisan light exposed as of schemes towards new powers constituted though not actually Constituted.  But can we yet enough discern that were there is intra-party smoke of such a scheming for a newly constituted “gun” power that there is yet enough to fathom how a “smoking gun” however intra-party is evidence of a international plotting of means, motive, and opportunity?  So far it seems the worlds greatest danger is that the Clintons have a scheme to have Bill Clinton be back and of a yet constituted power not checked by yet Constituted Power authorities as to a grand moment in a popular accolades too much of a general ignorance to an “I AM BACK” though more as an imposter.  It is of historical significance that the Clintons can be said to have lost in 2008 to Senator Barack H. Obama with HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT for the Clintons were legally being kept from sounding like what was thought of the 1990s successes to have been them.

    For now to be brief there seems just time to raise the alarms about possible dangers from so many different events of the past week and including the World Economic Forum so as if all are somehow now moving forward in a spirit quite as if having to rise from the ashes as like a famed phoenix.  Yes it is that I did try to defeat what seemed of dangers of the Clintons at intra-party coup attempts against a lame duck President Obama towards them being restored as the at least titular head of the Democrat Party and its politics.

    I cannot say with any confidence that President Obama was aware of such dangers initially or in then the real time of such concerns about his fate in his own party.  But really even if Michelle Obama had desires to help President Obama have two more terms by attempting like the Clintons to run their two halves now on the namesake of the spousal half it is that it must be common sense respecting natural states that any need for term limits must be even more greatly prudent to barring of a spouse as likely reasonably effected already too much and to being an actual greater threat.

    So historically and currently concernedly what should we take graphically from the suggestion of standards from the banners as flags of the Clintons’ Global Initiatives and as well that firstly of candidate Barack Obama?

    To see a threat approaching by any standard would be prudent and especially expected if the graphics and message in art of such is suggestive of past problems for humanity.  Why though can we say that the flags of the Japanese and of the European Union are artful and not too alarming even historically and yet the flag of the Third Reich of the same “art” and “message” problem psychopathy as the standards of the Clintons and too of Obama?

    Firstly how – right! – can we say the European circle of stars can be of a GOOD ART and the yet similar of the CGI Clintons as BAD POLITICS & BAD ART?  It cannot just be for there is a sense of an earth globe circle in the middle as like that of the Nazi Third Reich banner – or can it?

    To keep it simple and relative to dangers to Constituted and prudent powers of Peoples as per PHOENIX LAWLESS alarmism let us wrap the week, this week, basically with a reset wisdom that the flag of the Japanese state and of the European Union are celestial not earthly suggestive to dominance.

    To keep it simple about President Obama and as he likely still too at risk for more intra-party coup attempts by the Clintons to be “WE ARE BACK” or more just of a constituted power for Bill Clinton as of a SURPRISE!!! “I AM BACK” dominant posturing we are wise to now recognized and keep considering that his “O” flag is artfully suggestive as if he can be seen as leading the whole world with constituted popular power even though nowhere yet Constituted or really consecrated.

    A rising sun for the Japanese is what they live geo-politically as it is that as an island nation so physically endowed a whole People wakes near simultaneously to a rising sun of the East quite like of the solemnity of their historic standard.  A circle of stars for the European Union though is also a humbling art in a celestial axilating.

    It is alarming that the flag of the Clintons for their global image is what it is as their CGI banner.  It is a less than artful depiction of a violation of the European Union heavens of a natural state incivility graphically as an earthly subversion to the flag of the united European States.  It is violent in its broached circle of stars so and as violated in a Freudian with strong proud Clinton lines only slightly softened by a curvacious suggestion of a bosoming in Clintons.

    Though this is of future dangers for any rising from the economic ashes as per PHOENIX LAWLESS metaphoricals it is rightly obvious that the Clintons’ message of their CGI standard is an effrontery to the Stars and Stripes of Old Glory and as well to the European Union as more of a hoisting regular to assert an “I HAVE NEVER LEFT”!

    I/we should be alarmed by the graphic qualities of the standards of the Nazi Reich, the Clinton Global Initiative, and yes too the international too imperialistic “O” of he somehow still yet the at least seeming titular head of the Democrat Party.

    Firstly though that the CGI banner may be a spectacle as of a “I AM STILL HERE” “FEEL ME” art & message it is that we, yes, need be behoven to a potential for some to be of plots for a new constituted power of an “I AM BACK” that can yet be to powers constituted though not Constituted – Constituted yet anywhere.

  • KING CLINTON

    [ORIGINAL TO: Years ago.]

    Where are the Governors?  As the contrast was set so loudly and transparently this week, with President Bill Clinton of regaling, again as if of the authority to so hold court, as if the Clintons’ Global Initiatives a seat of power already established, and such that he can Lordly be about, as if the Clinton Global Autocrat crowned, and titled, as if he (and his wife) were both promoted from the office of the President of The United States of America:  Where are the Governors?

    In stark contrast to the too Lordly holding of Global Court by President William Jefferson Clinton was one who stood up for transparency, process, logic, and democratic patience whom if he had a colonial era powdered wig on likely would have firstly have been judged as if a George Washington impersonator.  It was in stark contrast that Senator Edward (”TED”) Cruz stood up so long and democratically as one more of the people and as a clear defender of the People all the while the Clintons were of putting on Lordish airs and taken to hosting as if of an established Power to hold Global Court under than banner as Clintons’ Global … 

    Where are the Governors?  What has happened to the common sense and governance theories of Hamilton, Madison & Jay?  How can the Clintons be succeeded as if in agreement with the “leadership” of President Obama all the while their recent documented history as of the Clintons’ Administration have so many official records of these two Democrat Party families of such different ideas of prudence?  How is it really, though, just that the Clintons are trying to be to the togetherness of the sovereigns of the world as Governor George Clinton tried to have set and secured otherwise than by the Constitution of The United States of America and its bolstering so as by Publius to educate and stir with that which is now of THE FEDERALIST PAPERS?  Where are the Governors?

    It is the Governors of the loosely confederated states whom are put down most by the nationalist presumptions of the Affordable Care Act.  I has to be considered that the politics of Obamacare “justification” is that the federal government has to do all this because too many of our Governors are failures – are not capable of caring for their own resident peoples – but for.  In the federalist scheme of Constitutional prudence it is that an establishment like that for the Federal Government so far as set about the Affordable Care Act & its amending by regulations does much put the Governors out of the business of being governors.  By the ideals of Obamacare it is that the national governance of the Executive Branch is at least now supposed to have eminent domain over peoples bodies and their privacy rights to their personal medical histories.  The body politics of the states now soon will be Law as set not of the protections of a more nearly elected governor but to being of the purview and establishment of the domain of the nations executive.  In the spirit of Obamacare as necessary to work and establish and “affordability” somehow for healthcare (and oddly by adding new layers of management) the national government is set to be of an authority and duty to order the People to have full medical exams and with a right to say when and how often so that data as for costly Power from information can be adequately assessed for efficiencies.

    Where are the Governors? Is your Governor really such a failure and boob unable to see to a more neighborly caring and securing of health regulations?  Is it just that your neighboring state’s Governor is a bad boob who would avoid doing a right and just thing caringly for his/her state’s People as long as he could corral his sickly and herd them out over his state’s borders into the too neighborly and naive neighbor state for their more compassionate & neighborly community caring?  Where are the Governors? 

    To understand the anti-Constitutionalism of the “BOGO” “two-fer” former First Couple Clintons you may actually have to have also, like the new Tea Party, have read THE FEDERALIST PAPERS.  Too how autocratic and Lordish the Clintons now appear all may need otherwise to check their doubting of economic pains as if for common sense & as by (doubting) Thomas Paine and his COMMON SENSE.  Too how courtly and complicit the Clintons are to their now being able, albeit less so now than their plans and strategizing had intended, to so like be to annually holding of a Clinton Global Court all may need to consider that they together have like always, since Law School, been of pillow talk spousally to figuring out how to get each of them elected President, despite Constitutional prudence being set in their way, and to figuring how one would or could be staged and established still with powers if and when delays and obstacles slowed them down.  It behoove all to consider the Clintons have always been united towards a possibility of becoming America’s first global (autocratic) leaders and too some of considerations that they would best be more like Governor George Clinton and as modern anti-Constitutionalists.

    Where are the Governors? With the ideals of the Affordable Care Act set so as a (too) temporary Law status far short of a more permanent Constitutional right, it is still critical for it as  a Nationalistic tool for power (and affordability) for it to remove the peoples’ rights from their state’s and governors’ more neighborly compassion and sense of community to the agenda(s) of a seated (& sworn) Executive as President.  For the meta data to be useful and sufficient to achieve the desired political efficiency or inefficiency by way of establishments authorized by the mere law of the Affordable Care Act there must be sufficient input for a calculus for any political prioritizing.  The Presidents will, it seems, be of the Power and Duty to decide how many times a year they should order the residents otherwise still of their state’s jurisdiction and Governor to show up at a doctors office for a new and however full medical exam so to update the national capacity to data mine for new efficiencies and more targeted political (partisan) platforms.  Where are the Governors?

    Reading this it should become apparent to readers of the HARRY POTTER series that grew from my challenge to JK Rowling for seven books for seven separate years in schooling curriculum in magic that HARRY POTTER must be on the side so now established as of Senator Ted Cruz.  The courtly selfish spousal Power plotting and polarizing too courtly and lording too global partisan political reigning attempts by the Clintons just are not of the charm of that intended to be of a suggested good or necessary or proper in the worlds of Hogwarts.  Senators Rand Paul and Ted Cruz with their most public teaching by standing however long however of a filibuster democracy posturing are quite of the freedoms that allow local charm and community good will to be nourished more as if by neighbors and villages.

    Where are your Governors?  It is more as if they are the SERIOUS BLACKS of your world and the Clintons too dangerously of regaling as if Lordish and Powered as Voldemort.  The godfather for HARRY POTTER as one a SERIOUS BLACK did come from me after JK Rowling while starting off on the challenge got back to me like complaining that I hadn’t yet given her enough to work with for even five books.  It was natural to me to suggest she give her lead character a godfather like mine who had to be serious about Volts and all wires as a lifelong union electrician – and, most serious always about the black wires and the primary “hot” wires to carry whichever volts.  R.I.P. my now late uncle godfather.  Like other characters of Hogwarts worlds there is that some came from playing with the spelling of iconic I channeled to JK.  Voldemort is a cautionary for young of the world and of days when my neighbors and friends were unknowingly of JK’s patron US so while as the firm of architects of design and construction management then of the Petronas Towers – Voldemort is of a concern of that which electricians have to be knowing of and guarded about while serious mostly about black as carrying volts – volts more than maybe even yet expected – volts d’ mor teed up like doubly in Europe than by USA standards.

    Where are the Governors? Hillary Rodham Clinton – most recently – but for being again as Bill Clinton’s First Lady for spousal global initiatives – Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is still of dominant personality traits to firstly being to professionally protecting her husband regardless of how the USA Constitution might otherwise be set.  Where are the Governors? 

    It seems implausible that Mrs. Clinton can yet learn any new tricks – it seems they are stuck for after all their years of plotting as if always and consistently with spousal pillow talk that they just never trained themselves or the other for the possibilities of a serious black like President Barack Hussein Obama.  It seems the Clintons do not have an answer to counter them as exposed as too courtly and too globally now of a hunger for a wishful autocratic Power – it seems quite implausible that they now can hide – that they can escape years of corner cutting and official negligence culpability or that “Hillary” is of a dominant personality trait of putting “Bill” first even it it to others may also appear to King-ish.

    Whether as HillaryCare – Obamacare – or resurgence as if “UniversalCare” as ClintonCare it is that if the mere law of ACA allowed to be fully implemented the good in it will no longer be of the power or jurisdiction of the Governors.  By eminent domain of a too socialistic political power written and secured by ACA it is that future Presidents now have the power to tell all the People as if more subjects than citizens when & where to show up for a most revealing medical examination and so that they can mine all subjects personal medical records as meta data to know how to more efficiently politically prescribe or program (partisan) Nationalistic permanent solutions.  They won’t just want the medical histories of all as of their domain – they will insist they have the power to tell us all how often and fully all personal parts need to be probed for their “politics”.

    Where is your Governor?  The charm of the French resistance as of the dramatic “round up the usual suspect” akin to “Play it again Sam” of CASA BLANCA has the Obama casa blanca “white house” is much of these too regal concerns.  To better work out a copacetic per dangers of Obama’s health posturing I for brevity direct you if so of a free will inclination to http://CitizenRosebud.org so that you can also find THE USUAL SUSPECTS.  For now as to the Lordly of the Clinton dangers it may behoove President Obama to use his ACA (”StormTroopers”) of his #IRS to leak Mrs. William Jefferson Clintons medical history as per at least her analytics that can attest to drug use or abuse and as well those however regular of her personal health papers to attest from full required mental examinations as to what is irreversibly of “dominant” personality traits. 

    Where is your Governor – where is their bully pulpit to protect the Presidency from institutional corruption as from a power and mere law authority to as well have like eminent domain over People as subjects and to as per even dictates to ascertain and secure each person’s full mental work-up? 

    Where is your Governor – where is their bully pulpit as even President Obama may now know each of his subjects per there meta data better than any might ever know themselves, and, as politically so empowered to call over members of the House of Representatives to go over their ward’s medical statistics by sex, race, personality, contrary meds in systems reports as checked against legal prescription levels so of the “data” now a keystroke away by keyword search targetable down to wards and streets and even by street numbers?

    Where are you?  Do you have any power and freedom left if such violations of old privacy rights so set in however by the thinking of the Supreme Court as by a temporary mere law of taxing authority classifiable as a type of law that in America is always for a TAX most at risk of being politically reversed and removed, and even if not yet an established cancer on the economies of the USA or the world?  Where are you?

  • MARXISM?

    [ORIGINAL TO 06/03/2012]

    “MARX IS BURNING”

         The important equity figure is near 6 Trillion.

         When President Obama took office there was a reported 6 Trillion available but sitting idle in private equity. When President Obama took office he may still have not realized how unfair it would be that some made it look far easier for Clintons to be First Couple in administering executively during their 8 than it actually was for those years.

         Though there was a reported 6 Trillion of private equity available at the time President Obama took office there was little he could do with it as a new Democrat now to SPEND, SPEND, SPEND & THEN TAX for after first round of new Dem spending private equity was smart enough to see their mattresses as offering better “return” on investment even if only offering zero return.

         Besides it quite unreasonable and not preposterous or of an injustice to note that the Clintons were made to be better than they were for of a time others were making it be too easy, relatively speaking of the challenges of those years, and seem easier to be a successful President than the work of the Clintons can explain, still. No it may not be fair to Obama that it was made to look far easier to be President those years than the actual workings for America now will attest.

         President Obama did come into office and move from old Dems “TAX AND SPEND” to a more progressive and irresponsible “SPEND, SPEND, SPEND & TAX” loose affiliation with limiting principles and financial prudence. He did come into office with a reported 6 Trillion in private equity available for investment if a profit could be reasonably and justly expected. He did come into office where that 6 Trillion was beyond he reach and reasoning as of private wealth. He is still in an office limited to spending mostly on a basis for revenues from profits or income or capital gains.

         Yes, GREAT WALLS can make good neighbors. Yes fences have also been to expressions that they too make better communities. Yes, President Obama had mattresses offering at zero predicted return more reasonable return than “investing” in an Obama economy – and so while he without “wealth” or “property” taxing that in America is kept to the preserves of much more local governance revenue long arms of collections.      Our federalist system with its different revenue collection methods does act like a fence or wall to defend our confederated republic and enumerated and protected freedoms and rights – and as well a general Welfare in common sense.

         Yes, it is reasonable to have at least considered that President elect Obama would have known of Nixon and the lesson most are if in politics supposed to take away about it being the cover-up that should ruin. But President elect Obama did commence to President Obama with clear efforts that can only best be described as of an attempt to cover-up for the Clintons.

         Have you found the missing years 1993 – 2001 yet?

         I don’t remember when the BIG DIG finished in Massachusetts nor when its vast sums of other states people’s money stopped flowing in excessive sums into such state, and, nor do I recall when the DOT COM BUST happened and how it directly effected the tech corridor about Boston and Massachusetts’ economy in general. These both seem to be big factors of a relevant chronology precedent to Massachusetts having Mitt Romney as a Republican Governor. For his state to have been at 51st place for job growth I am guessing that I am correct in remembering such preceded his governance.

         2012 really is seeming to be a year where people will be wondering again about the Clintons and their 8 years and finally maybe to realizing that they still don’t know how they were successful with many of their sold “successes” and be to relating with such as it seems clearer now that they have failed in attempts to help Dems with President Obama effect a repeat.

         Yes, it may be unfair still to President Obama that the Clintons were made to look better than they were and that those difficult years were made to look as if of an easy street of easy governance for our Executive leadership. Yes, it may be unfair that so many let it be thought that it could be that easy to be President.

         Our income and profit based federal revenue system may be all that saved us from this over-reaching initiated by the Clintons and carried further and too far by the Executive governance of Obama. Our states and localities have the authority to mend and/or maintain their “communities” and “civility” with “wealth” and “property” taxation – the new Dems proceeded with policies that needed “wealth” or “property” taxing power to “redistribution” – the new Dems by trying to do such still with an profits or income or capital gains limited authority did self construct a wall or fence between their ideals and their workability.

         It may go down in our future history books that President Obama’s biggest mistake was his work so polarizing and partisan in a political with a capital “P” to attempts to effect a cover-up for the Clintons.

         Have you found the missing years 1993 – 2001 yet?

         His efforts at job killing have been far stronger than his efforts to job creation and his “save” of GM may have been more about trying to effect a political remaking of such company than a “financial save” of such.

         We still have that before he commenced with his GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM platform to green energy we had as precedence that a similar green energy political push in Spain had cost at least two old economy jobs for each one new “green” job created. We have that there was precedence to expect that Obama meant to cut more jobs than he planned to create and multiples so for his aggressive politicizing was mixed with an austerity message with a call to a great new conservationism such that Americans should honestly have been warned by President Obama to expect that his furtherance of Dem ideology was set to actually kill off at least three to four jobs for each of the new politically correct green jobs.

          We can thank our founders and later geniuses who limited our federal government spending to revenues bases so on profits or income or capital gains. This doesn’t help President Obama with Dem ideology or actually help further the attempts to cover-up for the Clintons but it did allow people free economic expression and even a shift if of investment equity to otherwise shift plans to long term development where losses would be planned for next 4 – 8 years but with enough profit to be expected there after if it then seemed safe and/or profitable to be at least so endeaverous within American borders.

         But have you found the missing years 1993 – 2001 yet?

         Have you also yet considered that a national or federal effort to a new growth economy may do now more harm than good and that Americans now have to find ways closer to home and for a while more with any “redistribution” debate kept to where “wealth” or “property” taxation the revenue basis for community maintenance and civility bolstering?

         Yes I do believe the reports that there was near 6 Trillion in private equity sitting available and hungry for rational investing to reasonable returns for risk. I do believe that Dems some how missed that their ideology and SPEND, SPEND, SPEND & TAX new ways forewarned capitalists to days where their mattresses likely would be a better “investment” and for a while.

         They were the good guys and gals and well private equity capitalists were supposed to be the bad guys and gals.

         I still have no idea how the Dems did expect their “economic” ideas to actually work – it still seems clear that their aggressiveness was meant to cause this very economic condition and its austerity/conservationism.

         I still have no idea how the Dems while attempting a cover-up for Clintons did expect any Republican to naively partake in a bi-partisan self destructive politics.

         They tried the claiming to themselves as being the HEROES and the job creators of private sector as the VILLAINS.

         Our Internal Revenue Service was supposed to get the funding for new massive armies of tax collectors – and yet since our federal revenues are not of a basis from “wealth” or “property” such was as self defeating as so much else of Dems’ ideology.

         I still have no idea how Dems did think it would have worked if it could have worked – especially since it seems to be working exactly as it should have worked with so much “political” and “socialistic” injected preposterously and unjustly into and about our economy.

         I don’t know about MARX as per “KILL LISTS” his – I did learn a new phrase this morning from Andrew Sullivan seemingly quoting Cardinal Dolan – I did realize this new term and its usage suggest a call to consideration to due process and as of an innocence until a guilt proven. When you hear “preposterous and unjust” phrase do you first assume guilt or do you suspect a denial of due process or prejudice of a prejudgement maybe as unfair as that which its usage proffered regarding?

         As per the Dems misplaced ideology and practice these past few years we have that Dems as a class of subjects can be said to have caused the economic down turn while as an individual suspect President Obama more insulated and isolated though clearly of a willful association.

         A SIT REP now beyond the cover-up problem President Obama has with the rival class in his cabinet inclusive of at least a party to “two-fer” in person of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is that which is of his foreign policies of so much denial of due process and soft money redistributing. But this is punctuated in ways due clear emphasis.

         A SIT REP now beyond the cover-up problem President Obama has with the rival class in his cabinet inclusive of at least a party to “two-fer” in person of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is as well is an election year oddity especially for the Clintons that had half their supposed Hollywood friends rat them out as “BIG LIARS” and now as with fatality reports regularly still flowing as evidence as failures in a Diplomacy we have a messaging somehow still allowed near: Hillary lied and lies and soldiers are dying – Wow, what a great job Hillary is doing.

         A SIT REP now towards 2012 deciding now must encourage a less Marxist BLIND FAITH in Obama Diplomacy and get around to asking if we were once recently of Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts of regular disloyal assertions to his anti-war revival efforts of an earlier Communist scare so with “Bush lied soldiers died” how long can we now still tolerate the indiscriminate political “diplomacy” so partisan of Madam Secretary of State but as also to a “Hillary lies – more soldiers are dying.”?

         How did the Clinton economic team embraced by Obama White House as if it were the expected inevitable return of the Clintons fail? It can be said that their economic policies should have brought us all just here but that isn’t how they are telling their own stories. We have that if they could have back in 1993 they would have commenced earlier to this mess – they by not learning by the easy times they still can hardly well explain do seem still to fail to understand what was the “successes” of those years.

         We have that we could have had this fine mess in their first term if they had managed to have their way then – and so quite so much because our federal revenues are not based on “wealth” or “property” but are responsive to motivations of the People and their willingness to associate and cooperate economically. We have that the People likely would have gone on strike as well against such Dem “management” back as early as Clintons’ first term if they had managed to have had their way whence then.

  • HASAN PIKER – HABITS, & CONVENTIONS

    Abdul El-Sayed & Hasan Piker need face global political realities:

    If DSA – Dem Soc – Democratic Socialists – elected they better not violate their oaths to defend the actual constitution – it consecrated under God by preamble grammar as a Peoples’ “Order” (noun) – not a King’s Order – and it “subscribed” into “done” in “Year of our Lord.” ordained and established a constitution.

    But Americans we must have opened dialog especially for September 11 – Sept 11 – Al Qaeda Attacks – were TERRORISM by failure of words to have been Jihad justice.

    As other avenues paths for dispute mitigation were available and more facilitated with new internet of things it is WRONG to say AMERICA or AMERICANS deserved such attacks.

    But for AI to be Artificial Intelligence above sub-intelligent ww must have Muslim thinking programmed in of how though, perhaps there a strong case to say Bill and Hillary deserved justice for 1990s sub-moral selfish administering, but, though Hillary lost twice her guilt so accused did not become all Americans by association by electing a sub-moral Clinton.

    In 1993 the Clintons moved from governing as elected of better solutions in the 1992 wave they rode to selfishly bias international affairs as if making Mrs. Clinton into the first (F) POTUS could be an END justified all MEANS.

    Hasan Piker & El-Sayed have logical reasonable grounds to claim Clintons were owed some scale of justice – maybe internet could have been used peacefully towards.

    Due Hillary lost twice the Islamic rationality that would have allowed, by a guilt by willful association, all AMERICANS to be measured as due justice did not amass.

    Had Mrs. Clinton won Muslims were religiously free to judge all Americans as also as guilty as 1990s selfish admistering believed unjust?

    There is a rational pathology to Al Qaeda policed USA HOMELAND – did #77 & #911 into #11 of 1993 #93 grievances – in context of since Osama Bin Laden wasn’t allowed to police Saddam Hussein after Kuwait invasion, and then in 1993 Bill Clinton decided for term he didn’t want to and wouldn’t, morally left AQ to decide it must then be moral and just to attack/police USA.

    I still don’t know a reason flight 175 specifically could be a message in its # selection – but puzzle as my neighbor across street at 175 growing up did become President of Wellesley College.

    As I independently wondered long on WHY DID SADDAM THINK HE COULD KEEP KUWAIT there incidental concerns exposed of it seems he believed Al Gore was so predictable he was an American should be easy to defeat. And, with such the thought arose Saddam thought he could keep Kuwait because USA wouldn’t risk dynamic of likely to anger Al Qaeda types if it came into Gulf area itself.

    NEVER FORGET machines can soon reveal Clintons in 1990s made many horrible political decisions – and yet as such were counter to unity and hopefully for world in how they got elected it isn’t generally an associable GUILT upon all Americans.

    So at 25th Anniversary here you can start to counter Piker &  Abdul El-Sayed intellectually and in so rationally processing data determine thus BUSH was justified to have an Iraq War – even though may decide due how poorly run it thus shouldn’t have been advanced – due USA had a moral obligation to police Saddam Hussein in Islamic Justice pillars of faith.

    Iraq War now as well, by Christian morals, seems was prudent and necessary as, besides to get past deplorable inhumanity of 1990s Clintons’ AMERICAN ABANDONMENT, we would have become stuck on the wrong side of developing Arab Spring if bringing Saddam Hussein to justice had not been attempted.

    Saddam, for history, was like the godfather of AL Qaeda to American HATE – – – but for his thinking he could keep Kuwait AQ would not have become fixated – as he seemed calculate – upon USA?

    United Nations – UNGA – UNGA81 – now should field open dialog as TRUMP to be confused and hindered from Justice if do not.  Likewise to logically if UN nations now hinder discussions could exonerate Donald Trump – especially if Muslim – such nations can be said to themselves due Justice?

    On REPARATIONS yet Bill Clinton & Al Gore – while Hillary Clinton mentored by KKK member – individually have histories, if case by case judged of long directly at least of incriminating Southern WHITE PRIDE can be judiciously procedurally measured and judged? The King’s of AFRICA profited from selling off near 10% of their mere subjects – but likes of William Blythe III & Al Gore legacies of Southerners too proud of enslaving and owning humans as property?

    http://www.Hogan2Cents.com
    Please SUBSCRIBE!!!
    JPHogan
    Hogan2Cents