Hogan2Cents.com

     #RationalTextualism, & SCOTUS
SEMIQUINCENTENNIAL

     COMMON SENSE:

THE CORE LIBERTY CONSTITUTED BY THE PEOPLES’ “ORDER” (NOUN) “DONE” “SUBSCRIBED” TO IN “YEAR OF OUR LORD” IS THAT EACH’S RIGHTS COME FROM LORD CREATOR.

     THUS THEREFORE, AS USC W/O BLASPHEMY, EACH IS AN UNUM BY HOW UNITED OF PLURIBUS AS LEGALLY DESCRIBED & ASSERTED TO BE “A CHILD OF GOD.”

     HAVING RIGHTS FROM CREATOR MEANS EACH IS ESTABLISHED TO BE LEGALLY IN THE EYES OF THE LORD AS A CHILD OF GOD.

     THE SEPARATION OF CHURCH & STATE IS VERTICAL BY “MORE PERFECT UNION” BY NO DIVINE RIGHT OF MONARCH – NOR THEOCRACY AUTHORITY IN CONGRESS.

     DIVINITY RESTS IN EACH “CHILD” & DEMOCRACY FIRSTLY FOR USA OF PEOPLE SELF-GOVERNING LOCALLY WITHIN FAITH BASED ASSEMBLIES.

     USC BREVITY IS AS IT IS DEPENDENT ON PUBLIC MORALS INALIENABLE JURISPRUDENCE.

        ●  ●  ●  ●  ●

And:

     Ah the Constitution the Peoples “Order” (noun) “to form” a “more perfect Union” by there no divine right of monarch or theocracy power in Fed Gov so “subscribed” “done” in “Year of our Lord.”

     Each as an individual an unum by how united pluribus with rights from Creator is set under Lord’s Laws with brevity of USC works as is PUBLIC MORALS dependent.
     As rights from Creator the divine right is in each with due process & civil procedures when chaos neared?
     We are textually set under Judeo-Christian Lord Creator, also of Islam, as a perfection standard. Seems core vibe of Washington letter to Hews of Newport with each an unum of civic duty to wrestle with concepts of Creator & Lord’s law then available in print in English – accessible.
     2nd Amendment use of “a free state” seems as human condition of Liberty in religious freedom.

     1st Amendment “establishment of religion” means scripture  – Congress of no theocratic power to respectacle/change Lord’s Laws.

        ●  ●  ●  ●  ●

And:

ROCK TARIFFS SCOTUS

     Where is there common ground in “one code of morality” of common sense on constitutional powers?

     The powers of the Congress are yet of a fascinating rational textualism of it to make no law to respectacle – change – Lord’s Laws – the laws of the Creator our Peoples’ “Order” (noun) so with establishes each is a child of God legally.

     Obamacare is but a temporary war power as war on healthcare as nation had been heading in a wrong direction.

     Yet Healthcare rights are writ legal as indivisible from religious Liberty – so reaffirmed by 1st Amendment of jurisdiction of Lord’s Laws preserved powers left to assemblies of people in communities.

     So TARIFFS?

     Simply a POTUS must have TARIFF powers & authority until Congress with budget authority takes it away?

     Supreme Court as not to litigate from the bench is left the responsibility to defer to Congress?

     A budget power is respected where a Congress can act but doesn’t act?

     A POTUS can proceed until the most recently elected Congress decides it is their specific business to intercede on executive use of financial management tools?

     A new Congress w/o intervention does trump the prior seated representation to inaction can be consent sufficient at least for tools for financial management to be permitted?

    Again: Supreme Court limited to respecting the powers of Congress as real by inaction as well as voted methods?

      Thoughts?

HOGAN2CENTS
JP HOGAN